Paradoxes
In Chapter 5 we learn what a paradox is. The book defines a Paradoxical sentences as one that is "impossible to ascribe a truth value. The example used in the book is the following sentence:"This sentence is false."
We see that this sentence can not be labeled as true of false because if we say that the sentence is true then it is false, and it cannot be false, otherwise it would be true.
The following link will bring you to a site that gives examples of some known and unknown paradoxes that show how sentences and ultimately situations, can be said in a grammatically correct way, but when examined thoroughly are found to be paradoxical.
11 Brain-Twisting Paradoxes
After reading these examples I learned that even when someone says something that is grammatically correct and seems to be semantically correct as well, there are cases when a sentence can contradict itself. Only with further examination and knowledge on the meaning of a sentence (truth conditions) can we fully understand the possibilities of paradoxical sentences. We can see through many of the given examples that paradoxes can hinder our communication because of the confusion created by them. It can hurt the brain to analyze to the depth required to fully understand how paradoxes exist and interfere with language.
I feel like, after it all paradoxes help to expand our minds, if you will, like philosophy class. It makes you think harder than you may want to, but analysis is good especially when it comes to the analysis of the language that we speak.



